A Voice of Reason: Sane Views for a Crazy World

April 19, 2007

The Candidates Views on the “Supremes Latest Hit” Ban on Partial Birth Abortion

The candidates have been voicing their comments on today’s Supreme Court ruling affirming a Nebraska ban on partial birth abortions.

Rudy Giuliani: “The Supreme Court reached the correct conclusion in upholding the congressional ban on partial birth abortion,” Giuliani said in a statement on the 5–4 decision. “I agree with it.”

Okay, I know that in 2000 in a Senate run he did state that he would not vote for a woman’s right to undergo the procedure, however, times change. Call it a flip-flop if you want. Lincoln flip-flopped on slavery, and maybe this is one that the GOP can live with. Giuliani is protecting his right flank, but so are the other GOP frontrunners.

Hillary Clinton: Washington, DC — “This decision marks a dramatic departure from four decades of Supreme Court rulings that upheld a woman’s right to choose and recognized the importance of women’s health. Today’s decision blatantly defies the Court’s recent decision in 2000 striking down a state partial-birth abortion law because of its failure to provide an exception for the health of the mother. As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal; the rights and lives of women must be taken into account. It is precisely this erosion of our constitutional rights that I warned against when I opposed the nominations of Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.”

Well one good news for Sen. Clinton, there is now way the law effects her. I don’t think many men are interested and we all know that Bill is not really that interested either. Okay, that was horrible and mean, but it was fun to do!
This does little to help her with her base, and may actually hurt with some “Blue Dog” Democrats.

Sen. Obama: I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling, which dramatically departs from previous precedents safeguarding the health of pregnant women. As Justice Ginsburg emphasized in her dissenting opinion, this ruling signals an alarming willingness on the part of the conservative majority to disregard its prior rulings respecting a woman’s medical concerns and the very personal decisions between a doctor and patient. I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women.

To his credit this is about as much as Sen. Obama has said about “any” issue this campaign. His candidacy seems to be a great deal about being who he is – Barack – and who he’s not – Hillary – and not about his views and positions. However, this does little to effect his base, and also may hurt with some Blue Dog Democrats.

John Edwards: “I could not disagree more strongly with today’s Supreme Court decision. The ban upheld by the Court is an ill-considered and sweeping prohibition that does not even take account for serious threats to the health of individual women. This hard right turn is a stark reminder of why Democrats cannot afford to lose the 2008 election. Too much is at stake – starting with, as the Court made all too clear today, a woman’s right to choose.”

It’s just too bad that when he was a Senator, he MISSED the vote. Must have had other things to do I spose.
Well, this may hurt Sen. Edwards among Blue Dogs, but time will tell.

Sen. McCain: “I’m very happy about the decision given my position on abortion. Partial birth is one of the most odious aspects of abortion,” Arizona Sen. John McCain said while campaigning in South Carolina. In a separate statement issued by his campaign, McCain said, “It is critically important that our party continues to stand on the side of life.”

While some argue that Sen. McCain has been very consistent in his views about the abortion issue, in 1999 he did state that Roe v Wade should not be overturned, but has been advocating its repeal for the past few years. McCain has been making genuine statements to try and gather support from the GOP base.

Mit Romney: “Today, our nation’s highest court reaffirmed the value of life in America by upholding a ban on a practice that offends basic human decency,” Romney said in a statement. “This decision represents a step forward in protecting the weakest and most innocent among us.”

Romney has been on both sides of this issue in the past, but states that he does not favor an amendment to the Constitution to “ban” abortion, but feels it is an issue best decided by the states. Seems like Mr. Romney is also trying to ensure the base likes him.

Other candidates:
Sen. Brownback: the ruling would result “in lives being saved.” (the scope is too limited for that, but he is very popular with the Pro-Life movement.

Rep. Tancredo: said he hopes the decision is the first step toward a broader abortion ban.

Sen. Biden was unavailable for comment, though he voted in support of the ban.

Sen Dodd also was unavailable for comment, though he voted against the ban.



  1. Somebody please give the Dems some speech therapy. They can’t complete their sentences. “A woman’s right to choose . . .” what??!! What career they have? Whether to get married or not? What shoes to wear? Oh, what’s that – to choose whether or not to pay someone to crush and dismember their unborn child?

    Re. Obama’s sound bite about a “very personal decisions between a doctor and patient.” Again, a personal decision to do what? Extinguish the life of a living human being.

    Comment by Neil — April 19, 2007 @ 1:27 am | Reply

  2. It is interesting that the choice is left out. Maybe it’s a fill in the blank?

    The narrowness of this decision makes this ruling nothing for pro-lifers to bring out the band, and for pro-abortion rights advocates to hire the mourners.

    When Stephens retires, his replacement may be cause for some bands or mourners for either side.

    Comment by avoiceofreason — April 19, 2007 @ 1:33 am | Reply

  3. This is a great day for the pro-life movement. We have Senator Sam Brownback to thank for rejecting the Miers nomination and getting Justice Alito on the court.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 19, 2007 @ 1:57 am | Reply

  4. #3
    You are correct in mentioning Sen. Brownback, and I think a very good reward for him would be to remain in the Senate and continue to do his yeoman work.

    I hope you know I am kidding you! 🙂

    Comment by avoiceofreason — April 19, 2007 @ 2:08 am | Reply

  5. I believe this is a very small victory for the pro-life movement but a victory non the less.This just upholds the ban on the most odious aspects of abortion, to take the words of McCain, not abortion itself.

    Comment by mpinkeyes — April 19, 2007 @ 2:27 am | Reply

  6. I know you’re kidding, avor. Actually since Brownback has supported term limits he will not run for the Senate again. So it’s time for him to move forward.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 19, 2007 @ 2:51 am | Reply

  7. mpinkeyes, since this is the first time the Supremes have ruled against abortion, albeit a specific abortion procedure, this is more significant than you think. The new S.C. appointees are going nowhere soon. The liberals on the court are aging rapidly. Mark my words, this is only the beginning of a massive shift. Watch out, Roe!

    Comment by Psycheout — April 19, 2007 @ 2:53 am | Reply

  8. I would say it’s significant, partially because of the fact that any amount of lives saved is good, and it is really the first time since Roe v. Wade that the Supreme Court has actually “outlawed” any type of abortion.

    As to the candidate’s reactions, one thing you have to give the libs credit for is that they are, unlike several conservative candidates, being consistent. They view killing in one way as okay, so it really shouldn’t matter to them how brutal the murder is.

    Comment by thelonedrifter — April 19, 2007 @ 3:19 pm | Reply

  9. Good point Psycheout, that is the lasting legacy of President Bush that is forgotten right now. His supreme court appointments will shape the future fo years to come.

    Comment by mpinkeyes — April 19, 2007 @ 9:20 pm | Reply

  10. It will be very difficult for the liberals to forget, mpinkeyes. Let us constantly remind them. Heh.

    Comment by Psycheout — April 20, 2007 @ 7:09 am | Reply

  11. I just saw this post. Thanks for the breakdowns. I’m going to add this link to what i just posted since you have more thorough quotes of each of the candidates response.

    Comment by mommyzabs — April 21, 2007 @ 2:01 am | Reply

  12. […] of our contitutional right” (Tip to Stevereenie for the quote.) update: I this post on The Voice Of Reason blog that quotes most of the candidates response to this supreme court decision. Please give it a […]

    Pingback by Week News Cap (for my friends who don't watch the news) « mommy zabs — April 21, 2007 @ 2:05 am | Reply

  13. Thanks for the plug mommyzabs! 🙂

    Comment by avoiceofreason — April 21, 2007 @ 10:02 pm | Reply

  14. I just saw it did the trackback in your comments as well. very cool feature.

    Comment by mommyzabs — April 22, 2007 @ 1:18 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: