A Voice of Reason: Sane Views for a Crazy World

April 21, 2007

Clinton Presidency Would Mean a New Job for Bill

In a speech today in Iowa, Sen. Clinton announced that if elected her husband would make him a roaming ambassador to the world.

I wonder if he has a girl in every port – again I apologize but I couldn’t resist.

Here are excerpts:

MARSHALLTOWN, Iowa –

Sen Clinton, said Saturday that if she is elected president, she would make her husband a roaming ambassador to the world, using his skills to repair the nation’s tattered image abroad.

“I can’t think of a better cheerleader for America than Bill Clinton, can you?” the Democratic senator from New York asked a crowd jammed into a junior high school gymnasium. “He has said he would do anything I asked him to do. I would put him to work.”


“I’m very lucky that my husband has been so experienced in all of these areas,” said Clinton, who pointed to the diplomatic assignments her husband has carried out since leaving office, such as raising money for tsunami victims

I have a feeling that Bill Clinton “WOULD” do anything to get away from her, I mean can you blame him. As far as a better cheerleader for America, Monica always did have that vacuous glazed look of the prototypical cheerleader, although the rest of the body didn’t quite “fit” the prototype or into much anything less than xlarge.

Rich people didn’t make American great,” Clinton said. “It was the middle class who made this country great.”

Okay, so what’s your point?

She denounced the Bush administration, which she said has left the government incompetent. “They have shown contempt for our government,” Clinton said. “We’ve got to get back to having qualified people, not cronies, serving in the government of the United States.”

America agrees, and while they may not like the Bush Administration, they certainly aren’t showing adulation for Ms. Clinton. Her negatives are scary, and growing every day. The more we see, the less we like.

“You’ve got to have more help for communities when you have a lot of undocumented workers because they have costs associated with that and they don’t set immigration policy,” Clinton said.

Sadly, Ms. Clinton has not spoken about any policy positions of her own on this substantive area of national debate.

She also said any immigration reform must be tougher on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

Okay, that’s fair, what about the border? Silence…damn.

She said nothing will affect the issue until leaders of countries, such as Mexico, improve the economic lives for millions living in poverty.

Oh, so now we pay the welfare pay outs not only for illegals here, but to shore up those countries to stop future immigrants from coming into the country over the border, hey, what about the border?. Hey, at least we get them to do jobs for us when they are here. Umm…the border Senator? What about it??

Clinton also said she would raise taxes for the wealthy, who she said “aren’t paying their fair share.” She also praised the economic policies of her husband that brought budget surpluses.

Did she talk about securing the border? Damn, that idea slipped right by here. I guess she didn’t read this report about the stock market hitting 13000 yesterday. Hey, what about the border??

“We need to get back to fiscal responsibility,” she said.

We need to get you and Bill together out of the country representing us somewhere. Regardless of how badly the Bush Administration has run this country, and you can make a strong case that they have, NOBODY has forgotten how awful you and Bill were. Trust me Senator, the nation would likely repeal the 22nd Amendment rather than have you as Commander in Chief. That thought is just darned scary.

2 Comments »

  1. I wonder if he has a girl in every port – again I apologize but I couldn’t resist.
    That’s a good one there!

    Clinton also said she would raise taxes for the wealthy, who she said “aren’t paying their fair share.” She also praised the economic policies of her husband that brought budget surpluses.
    I love to hear politicians that say that they are going to raise taxes. That let’s me know that they have very socialists leanings. Who determines who is “rich?” Edwards has a different “rich” threshold than Obama and Clinton. You guys need to get your stuff together and come up with a common figure for the “rich.” What do you plan on doing with these taxes? Give it to the poor?

    A lot of people are always talking about these surpluses that Clinton had. I don’t understand why he had surpluses when he is suppose to be the president for the poor. Why does the gov’t have money sitting in an account somewhere when there are poor people out there starving that they are suppose to be spending that money on. Ask a homeless guy how much he cares about a budget surplus. LOL

    For some reason I am getting a vibe that you might not like Hillary.

    Comment by LLR — April 23, 2007 @ 2:35 am | Reply

  2. I feel she has worked hard for NY, and as a citizen I am glad for that, but what she’s worked for I typically don’t agree with.

    I think I could handle the other Dem nominees to varying degrees of dislike, but she really turns me off.

    Comment by avoiceofreason — April 23, 2007 @ 3:56 am | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: